All services
Adversarial AI

Your scanner says it's critical.
Is it actually exploitable?

Scanners have no context. They flag everything with a CVSS score, then leave the judgment to you. Horus uses adversarial AI to argue both sides of every ambiguous finding before it reaches your team.

Without adversarial validation
Sprint planning derailed by a CVSS 9.8 finding that, on closer inspection, only affects internal hosts with no public exploit available.
Your team spends two hours investigating whether a flagged service is patched. It is. That time is gone.
Everyone stops trusting the scanner. Real threats get buried under false positives.
With adversarial AI
Red Team generates a concrete attack narrative. Blue Team presents the defensive case. Judge calibrates confidence 0.0-1.0. You only see the verdict.
Verdicts are stored. Future scans of the same finding inherit the decision. No re-debating. 4 hours of triage saved per finding.
KEV-active findings bypass the debate entirely. They're auto-confirmed. The AI argues only where there's genuine ambiguity.
How it works

Attack. Defend. Judge. Store.

Every ambiguous finding goes through a 3-step adversarial process before it gets an SSVC priority.

01 / RED TEAM

Attack narrative generated

Red Team agent builds a concrete exploit path: threat actor motive, blast radius, attack vector. Context-aware, not boilerplate CVSS descriptions.

02 / BLUE TEAM

Defensive case argued

Blue Team agent counters: compensating controls, network segmentation, non-exploitable conditions. Checks whether the finding is already mitigated.

03 / JUDGE + STORE

Verdict calibrated and persisted

A third LLM weighs both arguments and outputs a confidence score 0.0-1.0. Verdict stored. Future scans inherit it without re-debating. Triage time drops to zero.

Live debate · CVE-2022-3602 · confidence 0.55
Red Team
Blue Team
CVE-2022-3602 · OpenSSL X.509 Overflow
admin.acmecorp.io · :443 · confidence 0.55
Red Team

Stack-based overflow in X.509 cert parsing. Attacker controls a cert in the TLS chain → code execution plausible. Internet-facing on port 443.

Blue Team

OpenSSL 3.0.7 patches this. Banner shows 3.0.7-1ubuntu1. WAF terminates TLS before OpenSSL processes it. NVD exploitability: none.

Judge verdict · confidence calibrated
Likely false positive · SSVC: TRACK
verdict stored · future scans inherit 4h triage saved
Full capability set

Everything in Adversarial AI.

Red/Blue debate, attack simulation and community verdict memory.

AI debate · per finding

Red / Blue Adversarial Validation

For ambiguous findings (confidence 0.2–0.9, no known exploit): Red argues attack, Blue argues defense, Judge calibrates. KEV-active findings skip debate, they're auto-confirmed. Verdicts stored and inherited across scans.

  • Context-aware attack narrative (Red)
  • Compensating control analysis (Blue)
  • Calibrated confidence 0.0–1.0
  • Verdict memory across scans
  • Cap: 15 debates per scan
  • KEV always bypasses → auto-confirmed
Attack simulation

Red Team Simulation Cycles

Full adversarial cycles against your live infrastructure. Red Team generates attack findings across multiple categories. Results feed into the main findings pipeline.

  • DNS spoofing attempts
  • Certificate / SSL attacks
  • Subdomain takeover checks
  • Known breach correlation
  • Live streaming progress (SSE)
Federated learning

Community Verdict Memory

Anonymous aggregation of verdicts across all Horus orgs. k-anonymity guarantee. New customers benefit from industry-learned FP suppression from day one.

  • k-anonymity (no org_id stored)
  • Priority: KEV > human > community
  • Nightly community refresh

Stop triaging manually.
Let AI argue first.

The live demo includes Red/Blue debate transcripts and Red Team simulation results.